MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009607870 · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e3181a02d1c

Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors of Uncertain Malignant Potential (STUMP):

2009· article· en· W2009607870 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSmooth musclePathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The current World Health Organization classification indicates that a uterine smooth muscle tumor that cannot be histologically diagnosed as unequivocally benign or malignant should be termed "smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential" (STUMP). STUMPs represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that have been the subject of only a few published studies, some of which lack detailed clinicopathologic details and/or follow-up data. More recently, it has been suggested that immunohistochemical staining may be helpful in the diagnosis of STUMPs. DESIGN: The clinicopathologic features of 16 cases of STUMP that exhibited usual smooth muscle differentiation, diagnosed between 1992 and 2006 from 11 hospitals, were studied and classified into 4 subgroups using terminology and criteria described by Stanford investigators. Immunohistochemical stains for p16, p53, MIB1 (ki-67), and estrogen and progesterone receptors were performed. The results were compared with those in the literature. RESULTS: The tumors were classified as follows: 6 as "atypical leiomyoma with limited experience", 7 as "smooth muscle tumor of low malignant potential", 2 as "atypical leiomyoma, low risk of recurrence," and 1 as "mitotically active leiomyoma, limited experience." Follow-up was 21 to 192 months (mean, 80.8 and median, 51.5). Only 2 tumors recurred, at 15 and 51 months, respectively; both were atypical leiomyoma with limited experience (multifocal moderate-to-severe atypia, no tumor cell necrosis, and mitotic counts of 4 and 5 mitotic figures /10 high-power fields, respectively). Both tumors had areas that were indistinguishable from benign leiomyoma and both had diffuse immunoreactivity for p16 and p53. Six other tumors that had focal staining for these markers all had a benign outcome. Both patients with recurrence were alive at last follow-up (at 40 and 74 mo). All the other patients were alive and disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: This and other studies suggest that uterine tumors classified as STUMPs using criteria proposed by Stanford investigators are usually clinically benign but should be considered tumors of low malignant potential because they can occasionally recur, in some cases, years after hysterectomy. After a mean follow-up of 80.8 months, only 2 of 16 tumors in this study recurred. Both of the latter tumors fulfilled the criteria for atypical leiomyoma with limited experience. Notably, the 2 recurrent tumors were the only ones that were strongly immunoreactive for p16 and p53, supporting earlier observations that these markers may be helpful in the prediction of the behavior of STUMPs. Patients diagnosed with STUMPs should receive long-term surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it