Circulating progenitor cells contribute to neointimal formation in nonirradiated chimeric mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that bone marrow-derived cells may contribute to repair and lesion formation following vascular injury. In most studies, bone marrow-derived cells were tracked by transplanting exogenous cells into bone marrow that had been compromised by irradiation. It remains to be determined whether endogenous circulating progenitors actually contribute to arterial remodeling under physiological conditions. Here, we established a parabiotic model in which two mice were conjoined subcutaneously without any vascular anastomosis. When wild-type mice were joined with transgenic mice that expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) in all tissues, GFP-positive cells were detected not only in the peripheral blood but also in the bone marrow of the wild-type mice. The femoral arteries of the wild-type mice were mechanically injured by insertion of a large wire. At 4 wk, there was neointima hyperplasia that mainly consisted of alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cells. GFP-positive cells were readily detected in the neointima (14.8+/-4.5%) and media (31.1+/-8.8%) of the injured artery. Some GFP-positive cells expressed alpha-smooth muscle actin or an endothelial cell marker. These results indicate that circulating progenitors contribute to re-endothelialization and neointimal formation after mechanical vascular injury even in nonirradiated mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".