Safety and antitumor efficacy of 153Sm-EDTMP and docetaxel administered sequentially to patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are responsible for most of the morbidity associated with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have been approved for palliation of painful skeletal metastases, but their clinical use is limited by concerns of toxicities both when administered alone and especially when combined with chemotherapy agents. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether docetaxel administered to mCRPC patients after treatment with samarium-153-labeled ethylene-diamine-tetra-methylene-phosphonic acid (Sm-EDTMP) has increased toxicity and/or reduced antitumor efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mCRPC patients with skeletal metastases were enrolled. Patients received standard therapy with docetaxel (75 mg/m intravenously every 21 days for at least six cycles) on average 6 weeks after Sm-EDTMP (37 MBq/kg). Patients were monitored for the presence of toxicities, and antitumor efficacy was assessed by changes in serum prostate-specific antigen levels. Besides standard descriptive statistical analysis, progression-free survival and overall survival were defined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Over 80% of the patients showed favorable biochemical responses. Median time to progression was 9.1 months (mean 9.8, 95% confidence interval 7.8-9.9), and median overall survival was 19.9 months (mean 24.5, 95% confidence interval 16.9-22.8); five patients were still alive over 5 years after enrollment. No additional hematological toxicities were observed when docetaxel was administered after Sm-EDTMP other than those expected when administering the agent alone. CONCLUSION: Prior administration of Sm-EDTMP does not cause additional toxicities for subsequent treatment with docetaxel and does not reduce the antitumor efficacy of the latter. This work justifies further investigations on the possible synergistic effects of combined strategies with the two agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".