MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009749006 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-2690

Abstract 2690: Evaluation of the hemostatic status in patients with prostate cancer using thromboelastography and tissue factor- microparticles

2012· article· en· W2009749006 on OpenAlexaff
Mazen Toukh, Angela Black, Robert Siemens, Maha Othman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood properties and coagulation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThromboelastographyProstate cancerCancerProstateThrombosisInternal medicineHemostasisFibrinolysisGastroenterologyCoagulopathyUrologyGynecologyCoagulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Coagulopathy is reported as the second most common cause of death from cancers, particularly prostate cancer. DVT and pulmonary embolism are two major thrombotic complications in prostate cancer and the risk is even higher with chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. Thromboelastography (TEG) is a global hemeostatic test that detects and specifies the type of coagulopathy encountered through a vesicoelastic trace that reflects the kinetics of the clot from the initial fibrin thread till and fibrinolysis. We performed a hemostatic study in 27 patients (age range 59-88 years) diagnosed with prostate cancer at various stages (metastatic and non-metastatic) as compared to a control group (n=9) matching the same age range and with -ve pathology for prostate cancer. The study included whole blood TEG and flow cytometry analysis of microprticles (MPs) in plasma using Annexin V- FITC and anti-tissue factor - PE. Analysis of the data revealed hypercoagulable state in all patients except two who were maintained on coumadin as prophylaxis for previous DVT. Hypercoagulability was indicated by shorter R time, increased alpha angle, MA and clot index. The mean values for TEG parameters in the patients were: R: 6.01 vs 9.8 minutes in the control group, alpha angle: 68.3 vs 53.1 degrees in controls, MA: 69.3 vs 57.9 mm in controls, and CI: 3.32 vs 0.7 in controls. Paired student t test showed significant differences as regards R time (P=0.009), MA (p=0.053) and CI (P=0.051). Microparticle assay revealed significant elevation in the number of microparticles carrying tissue factor in the patient group compared to the control group (p=0.05). The mean plasma TF-MPs in patient group was 5,142 MPs/uL compared to 2,914 MPs/ uL in the control group suggesting a link between elevated tissue factor and hypercoagulability observed in these patients. To our knowledge, this is the first report for the use of TEG in patients with prostate cancer. TEG is a relatively simple test that uses a small volume of blood and can be a useful tool for evaluation of patients’ thrombotic potential and may help identification of those who may require anticoagulant prophylaxis. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2690. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2690

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicBlood properties and coagulationFrench-language works237,207