Safety of Intranasally Administered Archaeal Lipid Mucosal Vaccine Adjuvant and Delivery (AMVAD) Vaccine in Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The safety profile of a recently described novel archaeal lipid mucosal vaccine adjuvant and delivery (AMVAD) system capable of eliciting robust antigen-specific mucosal and systemic immune responses was evaluated in female Balb/c mice (10/group) using ovalbumin (OVA) antigen. Mice were intranasally immunized (0, 7, and 21 days) with a vaccine comprising 1 microg OVA (0.05 mg/kg body weight) formulated in 0.04 mg total polar lipids extract (2.17 mg/kg body weight) of Methanobrevibacter smithii constituting the AMVAD system. Control groups were similarly immunized with 10-fold higher AMVAD vaccine dose (0.54 mg OVA and 21.7 mg lipid per kg), saline, 10 microg OVA in saline, or 0.04 or 0.4 mg lipid constituting empty AMVAD (no OVA) in saline, or were naive mice. Clinical signs, rectal temperature, and body weight were monitored once daily or as appropriate. Half the mice in each group were euthanized at 2 days after the first immunization. Blood was collected for clinical chemistry analyses. Major organs (heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, thymus, and brain) were examined macroscopically and histologically. The remaining mice were euthanized at 29 days and blood and organs collected for analyses as done at 2 days. Feces collected at 27 days, and sera, bile, and nasal lavage at 29 days, were assayed for antibody responses. Based on clinical symptoms, temperature, body weight changes, serum clinical chemistry, and tissue histopathology, there were no overt toxicities associated with OVA/AMVAD or empty AMVAD vaccines. There were no antibodies elicited against the lipids comprising the AMVAD system. These results demonstrate that at 10-fold excess dose of that required for vaccine efficacy, intranasally administered AMVAD vaccine appears to be relatively safe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".