Embodied Imagination: Emotional Expression Perception of Dynamic Line-Drawings Created by Artists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to challenge the relation of image generation, expression production, and expressive perception as related to the symbolic transformation of experiences (imagination) and artistic communication; as well as, the linkage between emotion, action, and perception in the dynamic person-object relationship in pictorial perception associated with a high-level experience like the aesthetic. This article reports on a research project that focuses on intra-cultural and inter-cultural (Greek-Canadian) variation of the perceptual experience of artistic, non-representational line-drawing depicting the subjective experience of the emotions of Joy and Fear, as compared to the communicability of the relevant emotional schemas stated in words. A series of experiments was designed to gain insight into the complexities of self-world interaction involving the image generation—as a schematized depiction, the perceptual experience and imagination processes, which are the basis of artistic communication, and emotional concepts that bear cultural diversity. Analysis of the results revealed a shared “embodied” frame of reference cross-culturally especially for the negative emotion of fear. This finding highlights the intersubjective nature of our “embodied” subjectivity, as an imaginative productive act—an enactment of lived significance that induces a shared understanding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".