MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009829758 · doi:10.1002/bltj.20081

The wireless edge router: A network processor-based packet data serving node for a CDMA2000* network

2005· article· en· W2009829758 on OpenAlexaff
Sarit Mukherjee, Anand Kagalkar, John C. Lin, Sarang Gadgil, Sanjoy Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueBell Labs Technical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacket processingComputer networkPacket analyzerProcessing delayComputer scienceNetwork packetNetwork processorRouterDefault gatewaySource routingLink state packetPacket switchingPacket generatorEmbedded systemTransmission delayRouting tableRouting protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A network processing unit (NPU) is increasingly becoming the processor of choice for building custom packet-processing gateways. In this paper, we present an NPU-based design and architecture for a packet data serving node (PDSN) in a CDMA2000∗network. A PDSN is a packet-processing gateway that interfaces between the Internet and the wireless radio access network to provide packet data services to mobile users. We map the different functions of the PDSN onto the packet-processing engines and the core processor of an NPU. This involves a complete separation of the control plane, which is implemented in the core processor, and the data plane, which is implemented using a multistage packet pipeline mapped onto the packet-processing engines. We describe resource allocation schemes for packet buffering and processing and also a flexible communication method with the core processor. The mechanisms described in the paper are general enough to be used to implement other NPU-based packet-processing gateways. We also present a prototype implementation of the PDSN on an NPU and show its superiority to commercial products by means of measurement experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBell Labs Technical JournalSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207