Intramatrix events during cryopreservation of porcine articular cartilage using rapid cooling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryopreservation of articular cartilage may improve long-term transplantation results if cell and matrix integrity can be maintained. This study examined intramatrix events in intact porcine articular cartilage that occurred during a rapid-cooling technique with various concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 M). Thermocouples were inserted into the solution and in the cartilage matrix to record the temperature during rapid cooling. In addition, scanning electron microscopy of freeze-substituted samples was performed and quantitatively evaluated for the areas representing ice in the matrix. The results of this study showed that low concentrations of DMSO resulted in the largest temperature gradient between the matrix and the surrounding solution, which occurred near the freezing point of the cryoprotectant solution. At higher concentrations of DMSO, the peak temperature gradient occurred near the glass transition temperature. The temperature measurements suggested that a significant amount of ice formed within the matrix at lower DMSO concentrations. At higher DMSO concentrations that resulted in vitrification of the external solution, there was evidence of some ice in the matrix. The scanning electron micrographs demonstrated significantly more matrix disruption (likely due to ice formation) (P<0.02) in the lower DMSO concentrations (1 and 5 M) while the 6 M DMSO concentration demonstrated minimal matrix disruption. Cryopreservation of articular cartilage with a rapid-cooling technique and high concentrations of DMSO resulted in partial vitrification of the matrix and significantly less matrix disruption. It appears that successful cryopreservation of viability and function in articular cartilage will require high concentrations of cryoprotectants and rapid cooling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".