MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009944616 · doi:10.1063/1.2177588

Neoclassical generation of toroidal zonal flow by drift wave turbulence

2006· article· en· W2009944616 on OpenAlexaff
A. B. Mikhaǐlovskiǐ, A. I. Smolyakov, V. S. Tsypin, E. A. Kovalishen, M. S. Shirokov, R. M. O. Galvão

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsInstabilityToroidTurbulenceZonal flow (plasma)MechanicsDispersion relationWave turbulenceFlow (mathematics)WavenumberClassical mechanicsPlasmaTokamakCondensed matter physicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zonal-flow instabilities due to drift-wave turbulence in the presence of toroidicity-induced parallel (neoclassical) viscosity and allowing for the toroidal flow are studied. It is shown that, as a result of the neoclassical viscosity a new type of zonal-flow instability is possible, leading to the generation of the considerable toroidal zonal flow. The toroidal instability is complementary to the previously studied instability resulting in the poloidal flow generation and occurs as a second branch of the general dispersion relation describing the evolution of the poloidal and toroidal flow. Nonlinear saturation of the new instability is studied. It is shown that saturated zonal toroidal velocity, generated in this instability, is large compared to the mean cross-field drift velocity as the ratio q∕ϵ, where q is the safety factor and ϵ is the inverse aspect ratio. In addition to the broad turbulent spectrum of drift waves, a monochromatic wave packet is considered. It is revealed that for the case of sufficiently strong neoclassical viscosity such a wave packet is subjected to generation of the toroidal zonal flow due to instability of hydrodynamic type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207