Initial Orthostatic Hypotension at High Altitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several reports on syncope occurring following standing at high altitude (HA), yet description of the detailed physiological responses to standing at HA are lacking. We examined the hypothesis that appropriate physiological adjustments to upright posture would be compromised at HA (5050 m). Ten healthy volunteers stood up rapidly from supine rest, for 3 min, at sea level and at 5050 m. Beat-to-beat mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, Finometer), middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, Transcranial Doppler), end-tidal PCO(2) and PO(2), and heart rate (ECG) were recorded continuously. After 14 days at HA, baseline MAP and MCAv were not different to sea level, although HR was elevated. Neither the magnitude of initial (<15 s) responses to standing, nor the time course of initial recovery differed at HA compared with sea level (p > 0.05). By 3 min of standing, MAP was restored to supine values both at sea level (-3 +/- 12 mmHg) and HA (4 +/- 10 mmHg), although there was more complete recovery of HR at sea level (+13 +/- 10 b.min(-1), p = 0.02 vs. + 23 +/- 10 b.min(-1), p = 0.01). Reduced MCAv at 3 min was comparable at sea level and altitude (both -16%). These data indicate that initial cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to standing are unaltered when partially acclimatized to HA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".