Robust model predictive control of constrained non‐linear systems: adopting the non‐squared integrand objective function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a novel robust model predictive control (MPC) method for constrained non‐linear systems with control constraints and external disturbances. The control signal is obtained by optimising an objective function consisting of two terms: an integral non‐squared stage cost and a non‐squared terminal cost. The terminal weighting matrix is designed appropriately such that: (i) the terminal cost serves as a control Lyapunov function; and (ii) the resultant finite horizon cost can be treated as a quasi‐infinite horizon cost. Provided that the Jacobian linearisation of the system to be controlled is stabilisable and the optimisation is initially feasible, sufficient conditions ensuring the recursive feasibility of the optimisation and the robust stability of the closed‐loop system are established. It is shown that the conditions rely on an appropriate design of the sampling interval with respect to a certain given disturbance level. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated through a numerical example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it