Deamidation of -Asn-Gly- Sequences during Sample Preparation for Proteomics: Consequences for MALDI and HPLC-MALDI Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We find that peptides containing -Asn-Gly- sequences typically show approximately 70-80% degree of deamidation after standard overnight (approximately 12 h) tryptic digestion at 37 degrees C. This emphasizes the need for more detailed information about the deamidation reaction in -Asn-Gly- sequences, in which two deamidated species are produced, one containing an aspartic acid (-Asp-Gly-) residue and the other containing an isoaspartic acid (-betaAsp-Gly-) residue. For the peptide SLNGEWR (54-60 beta-galactosidase, E. coli), all three components of the reaction mixture were separated by HPLC on C18 300-A sorbent, with trifluoroacetic acid as an ion-pairing modifier. Their intensity ratios suggested the elution order -betaAsp-/-Asn-/-Asp-, which was subsequently confirmed by MALDI MS and MS/MS analysis. The kinetics of the deamidation was studied in detail for the synthetic SLNGEWR parent using RP HPLC with UV detection. The half-life of this peptide was found to be approximately 8 h under digestion conditions. Analysis of a large pool of peptide retention data shows that the -betaAsp-/-Asn-/ -Asp- retention order is normally observed under the above conditions, especially if the original -NG- sequence is surrounded by hydrophobic amino acids. However, changing chromatographic conditions to 100-A pore size sorbents, or using formic acid as a modifier, increases the retention time of -betaAsp- relative to the -Asn-/-Asp- pair, so the order can sometimes be different.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".