Fluorescence Based Structural Analysis of Tryptophan Analogue-AMP Formation in Single Tryptophan Mutants of <i>Bacillus stearothermophilus </i>Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The symmetrical dimer structure of tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase is similar to that of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase whose binding behavior and structural details have been elucidated in detail. The structure of both subunits after forming the intermediate tryptophanyl-AMP has important implications for the binding of the cognate tRNA(Trp). Single tryptophan mutants of Bacillus stearothermophilus tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase have been constructed and expressed and used to probe structural changes in different domains of the enzyme in both subunits. Substrate titrations using the Trp analogues 4-fluorotryptophan and 7-azatryptophan in the presence of ATP to form the corresponding aminoacyl-adenylate reveal significant structural changes occurring throughout the active subunit in regions not confined to the active site. Changes in environment around the specific Trp residues were monitored using UV absorbance and steady-state fluorescence measurements. When titrated with 4-fluorotryptophan, both Trp 91 and Trp 290 fluorescence is quenched (49 and 22%, respectively) when one subunit has formed Trp-AMP. The fluorescence of Trp 48 is enhanced 19%. No further change in signal was observed after a 1:1 dimer/L-4FW-AMP complex ratio had been established. Using an anion-exchange filter binding assay with radiolabeled l-Trp as a substrate, binding to only one subunit was observed under nonsaturating conditions. This agrees with the results of the assay using 7-azatryptophan as a substrate. The observed changes extend to the unfilled subunit where a similar structure is believed to form after one subunit has formed tryptophan-AMP. Movement in the regions of the enzyme containing Trp 290 and Trp 91 suggests a mechanism for cross-subunit communication involving the helical backbone and dimer interface containing these two residues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".