Male sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) coda production and coda-type usage depend on the presence of conspecifics and the behavioural context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sperm whale ( Physeter macrocephalus L., 1758 (= Physeter catodon L., 1758)) codas serve a communication function, but the message they carry remains unknown. Very few codas and extremely few coda types are available from males. For 7 years we studied the coda occurrence and the coda types produced by 15 males in different behavioural and encounter contexts. Of the 67 encounters, 615 codas were produced by nonsolitary males. Codas occurred in 60% of the nonsolitary encounters and 36% of the dive cycles. Four hundred and ninety codas have been categorized into 8 coda families and 25 distinctive coda types. Both the coda type used and the dive cycle phase in which codas occurred strongly depended on the behavioural context. This is the first time that coda types have been associated with particular behavioural contexts. The “Three plus” family coda types were mainly used by ascending or descending whales in feeding dive cycles. The “Regular” and “Progressive” families were used almost exclusively by interacting whales. The “Root” coda family was used exclusively at surface, mainly in altered dive cycles. The coda types used in these three behavioural contexts seem to carry different messages and are proposed to be named “dive cycle codas”, “social codas”, and “alarm codas”, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".