Immediate and short‐term effects of pulmonary artery banding on left ventricular performance in foetal sheep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate foetal left ventricular performance when its preload was increased by banding the pulmonary artery, a study design where a simultaneous change in left ventricular afterload is unlikely. METHODS: Nine ovine foetuses were studied with real-time images and Doppler echocardiography before, 3-4 and 6-8 d after surgery. Seven of these foetuses were also studied during the surgical intervention, immediately before and within 2 min after banding. RESULTS: The immediate effects of a 90-95% reduction of the pulmonary artery cross-sectional area were: a 53 +/- 20% (mean +/- SD) decrease and a 38 +/- 10% increase of right (RvQ) and left ventricular output (LvQ), respectively. Comparing measurements before and 3-4 d after operation, there was a 64 +/- 16% decrease of RvQ and a 64 +/- 25% increase of LvQ. The increase in LvQ was due to an increase in both heart rate (19 +/- 10%) and stroke volume (38 +/- 18%). After an additional 3-4 postoperative days, heart rate remained increased to the same extent, but there was a more pronounced increase of LvQ (93 +/- 19%) and stroke volume (59 +/- 22%). CONCLUSION: The parallel foetal circulation has a capacity to handle a severely increased afterload for the right ventricle by immediately improving and maintaining an increased left ventricular performance. This improvement was in part accomplished by an increase in stroke volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".