MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2010425320 · doi:10.1118/1.3181094

SU‐EE‐A1‐02: In Vivo Dosimetry for HDR Brachytherapy Using a Scintillating Fiber Dosimeter

2009· article· en· W2010425320 on OpenAlexaff
François Therriault‐Proulx, M. Villeneuve, A. González Martín, L Gingras, Sam Beddar, Luc Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDosimeterDosimetryImaging phantomBrachytherapyThermoluminescent dosimeterNuclear medicineMaterials scienceDose profileMedical physicsOptical fiberBiomedical engineeringOpticsPhysicsMedicineRadiation therapyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The goal was to develop a scintillating fiber dosimeter and verify its suitability in assessing the dose deposited during brachytherapy HDR treatments. As a first step toward in vivo dosimetry, it has been decided to conduct a full process, from planning to treatment, using a prostate phantom. Method and Materials: The scintillating fiber dosimetry system is composed of a RGB photodiode (MCS3AT) detecting light emitted from a scintillator (BCF‐60) coupled to a plastic optical fiber. Fiber is aligned on the photodiode, and its output is then amplified and acquired through a National Instruments acquisition card. Signal processing, including Cerenkov and fluorescence light subtraction, is done and dose deposited during treatment is obtained through integration. A prostate phantom (CIRS ♯053) has been used to conduct the study. An ultrasound‐guided catheter insertion procedure was performed by a radiation oncologist at our institution. A total of 13 catheters were inserted, one of those being used for the dosimeter. Following a CT scan, the prostate and urethra were contoured and treatment planning was performed according to our prostate clinical protocol on a PLATO workstation (Nucletron BV, Netherlands). The plan was delivered using a microSelectron V2 192Ir afterloader. Results: We measured dose rate as function of time. It varies with distance between the dosimeter and the dwell‐positions. Dose rate integration, once the contamination component is subtracted, determines the total dose deposited during treatment. Measurements were within 2% of the dose predicted by the planning system. Conclusion: Scintillating fiber dosimeter provides an accurate method to assess dose deposited to targets and organs at risk during HDR brachytherapy. Dose rates measured allow QA of treatment delivery for each catheter and total delivered dose. Measurements have been done in a prostate phantom, but there is a potential for a variety of clinical sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→