MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010428428 · doi:10.1115/dscc2013-3987

Robust Control of an HVAC System via a Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Technique

2013· article· en· W2010428428 on OpenAlexaff
Kaveh Kianfar, Roozbeh Izadi‐Zamanabadi, Mehrdad Saif

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSliding mode controlHVACControl theory (sociology)Control systemComputer scienceMode (computer interface)Robust controlControl (management)Control engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysicsElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents design and implementation of a super twisting sliding mode control for superheat temperature and evaporating temperature of refrigerant fluid in an evaporator of HVAC (Heating-Ventilation and Air Conditioning)-Refrigeration system. Based on a nonlinear model of the evaporator two control approaches are presented. The first approach is based on a Multi-Input Multi Output (MIMO) system in which there are two control inputs; inlet mass flow and outlet mass flow rate, and the outputs are the length of two phase flow and evaporating temperature of refrigerant. The second approach considers the system as a Single input single output (SISO) one, and by using inlet mass flow, superheat temperature is controlled. In the first approach, by implementing a feedback linearization method the two control inputs are decoupled. By decoupling the effects of both inputs, the two state variables of system are controlled separately and effectively. By applying sliding mode control robustness against the disturbances and uncertainties is guaranteed. Super-twisting algorithm is applied as a remedy for chattering problem in classical sliding mode control and achieving finite time convergence. Controller and model of systems are simulated using MATLAB and Simulink. The results of simulations show the effectiveness of designed controller in presence of uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207