Bichromatic random laser from a powder of rhodamine-doped sub-micrometer silica particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the random laser (RL) bichromatic emission (BCE) from a powder consisting of silica particles infiltrated with Rhodamine 640 (Rh640) molecules. The BCE is attributed to Rh640 monomers and dimers. Because of the efficient monomer-dimer energy transfer, we observed RL wavelength switching from ≈ 620 nm to ≈650 nm and the control of the emitted wavelength was made by changing only the excitation laser intensity. None of external parameters such as excitation laser spot size or radiation detector position was changed as in previous experiments. Two laser thresholds associated either to monomers or dimers were clearly observed. Moreover, an effect analog to frequency-pulling among two coupled oscillators was identified measuring the RL spectra as a function of the excitation laser intensity. A wavelength shift, Δλ, was measured between the monomer and dimer resonance wavelengths, changing only the excitation laser intensity. The maximum value of Δλ ≈ 16 cm−1 was obtained for laser pulses of 7 ns with 30 μJ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".