Prepubertal Propagation of Transgenic Cloned Goats by Laparoscopic Ovum Pick-Up and <i>In Vitro</i> Embryo Production
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of laparoscopic ovum pick-up (LOPU) followed by in vitro embryo production was evaluated in the early propagation of cloned goats. Ten kinder goats produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer technology were used as oocyte donors. Half of the donor animals were subjected to LOPU at 2-3 months of age (prior to induction of lactation), whereas the other five goats were subjected to LOPU at 6-7 months of age (following induction to lactation). They were stimulated with 80 mg NIH-FSH-P1 (Folltropin, Vetrepharm, Canada) together with 300 IU eCG (Novormon, Vetrepharm, Canada) administered intramuscularly 36 h prior to LOPU. The number of follicles aspirated and oocytes recovered was higher in the younger group of donors (57 +/- 7 and 41 +/- 4 vs. 28 +/- 2 and 25.8 +/- 2, p < 0.05), however, oocytes from animals in the late prepubertal age showed higher developmental capacity resulting in higher transferable embryo yield (81.4% vs. 67.8%, p < 0.01), pregnancy rate (80% vs. 40%, p < 0.05) and total kids born (27 vs. 15, p < 0.01). In conclusion, LOPU in combination with in vitro embryo production techniques is an efficient method for the early propagation of valuable goats produced by somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it