Validity of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials as Early Indicators of Neural Compromise in Rat Model of Spinal Cord Compression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled study of intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) as early indicators of neural compromise in a rat model of spinal cord compression. OBJECTIVE: To determine the temporal threshold at which a complete (100%) loss of intraoperative TcMEPs will result in significant postoperative functional deficits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is controversy about the best TcMEP alarm criteria for intraoperative spinal cord protection. Clinical trials provide some evidence, but randomized controlled trials, which are not feasible in humans, are lacking. METHODS: Twenty-four adult male Wistar rats were divided into 3 experimental groups according to the length of time that a 100% TcMEP signal loss was maintained; all animals had preoperative functional testing. After surgical placement of a balloon catheter in the thoracic sublaminar space, TcMEPs were recorded while the spinal cord was compressed by balloon inflation. The recordings were terminated after maintaining a 100% TcMEP loss for different time periods (0, 5, or 15 min). Functional behavioral testing was repeated after 24 hours. RESULTS: Only the groups wherein the catheter was left inflated for 5 or 15 minutes after a complete (100%) loss of TcMEP amplitude showed a significant deterioration in functional testing as compared with preoperative baseline values. Functional testing remained normal for both the control group and the group in which termination of spinal cord compression occurred immediately after a decrease of TcMEP amplitude to 100%. There was a strong correlation between TcMEP amplitude recovery postintervention and functional ability at 24 hours postsurgery. CONCLUSION: If a 100% loss of TcMEP signals is immediately recognized and reversed by rapid removal of the compressive force on the spinal cord, normal postoperative function was observed in this rat model. However, delaying intervention for even 5 minutes can result in significant postoperative functional deficits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".