Role of endothelin and vasopressin in DOCA‐salt hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. The relative roles of endothelin (ET) and vasopressin (AVP) in the regulation of blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were investigated in the early stages (24 - 31 days) of development of hypertension in the conscious deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt hypertensive rat model. 2. BP was recorded with radiotelemetry devices and CO with ultrasonic transit-time probes. TPR was calculated from the BP and CO recordings. The contributions of endogenous ET and AVP were studied by infusing [d(CH(2))(5)(1),O-Me_Tyr(2),Arg(8)]-vasopressin, a V(1)-receptor antagonist, and bosentan, a mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist (Study 1). Vascular responsiveness was estimated from the changes in TPR evoked by i.v. infusions of ET-1 and AVP (Study 2). 3. In study 1, infusion of bosentan reduced TPR and BP dramatically in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats but not in SHAM control rats, and this effect was greater when the AVP system had been blocked. In contrast, the V(1) receptor antagonist alone failed to change TPR and BP in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. However, subsequent infusion of the V(1) receptor antagonist during the plateau phase of the response in bosentan pretreated DOCA-salt hypertensive rats led to significant decreases in both BP and TPR. 4. In study 2, TPR and BP responses to ET-1, but not AVP, were greater in DOCA-salt rats than in control rats. CO responses to ET-1 or AVP were similar in the two groups. 5. The results suggest that both ET and AVP play a role in the maintenance of TPR and BP; when one system is blocked the other compensates. However, the magnitude of the contribution to the hypertensive state appears greater for ET than for AVP. Enhanced vascular responses to ET appear to contribute to this greater role.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".