A Reflexive Inquiry of Two Non-Smokers: A Trans-Generational Tale of Social Gospel and Social Norms Marketing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the course of one academic year, two researchers combined research methods of reflexive inquiry and memory-work to understand the situated learning during their teen years in terms of its influence on their not taking up cigarette smoking. The Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) and the influence of the social gospel were central to the Ontario farm community in which Dorothy grew up in the 1960s. Angie grew up in small town Nova Scotia during the 1990s, exposed to parental smoking and the social marketing of the health hazards of smoking. The researchers draw on the critical incident questionnaire (Brookfield, 1995) as a way to remember 'nodal moments' in their smoking/non-smoking autobiographies. Their autobiographies serve as embodied reflexive texts and triggers to engage in dialogue on the deeper social meaning of not taking up smoking as teenagers. They conclude that traces of the social gospel remain as an influence in Angie's teen years, and that Dorothy was exposed to anti-smoking social marketing in the 1960s even before it had this name.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it