MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010480562 · doi:10.2989/16085910509503828

Oualidia lagoon, Morocco: an estuary without a river

2005· article· en· W2010480562 on OpenAlexaff
K Hilmi, VG Koutitonsky, A. Orbi, JI Lakhdar, Mohamed Chagdali

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Aquatic Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflowEstuaryCurrent meterCurrent (fluid)Hydrology (agriculture)Mesoscale meteorologyEnvironmental scienceAdvectionOutflowFreshwater inflowOceanographyGroundwaterGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study describes some physical oceanography features of an estuary maintained by fresh groundwater inflow. The mesoscale variability of currents, temperature and salinity are documented from moored current meter observations of 12 days duration at three stations. Current speeds exceeded 0.7m.s−1 during spring tides and decrease to 0.1m.s−1 during neap tides. Current directions followed the major channel axes, reversing by 180 degrees between the flood and the ebb tides. Harmonic analysis indicated that tidal currents were mainly semi-diurnal, with a predominance of the M2 harmonic, but included M4 and M6 sub-harmonics, possibly resulting from non-linear interactions of the flow with the shallow bottom and channel curvatures. Close to the lagoon entrance the water is of marine character but, further upstream, salinity decreased significantly. In the absence of river runoff, this decrease must result from some yet undisclosed underground freshwater inflow. The water renewal time estimated using the tidal prism method was at least two tidal cycles. Using the fresh-water fraction method, the groundwater inflow was estimated to be 2.3m3.s−1 at most. Coupled 2D hydrodynamic and advection-dispersion models (MIKE21) were then used to verify some renewal times. The tidally averaged renewal time for the whole lagoon was found to be 7 days, while the local renewal time at the upstream end of the lagoon was 25 days. Finally, an inverse modelling approach using MIKE21 was used to estimate the groundwater inflow required to produce the observed salinities. That inflow was found to be 0.25m3.s−1 for the period under consideration, showing that the tidal prism method gave flows that were far too high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of Aquatic ScienceSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207