MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010490126 · doi:10.3821/1913-701x-143.2.82

Perioperative Medication Management (POMM) Pilot: Integrating a Community-Based Medication History (MedsCheck) into Medication Reconciliation for Elective Orthopedic Surgery Inpatients

2010· article· en· W2010490126 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Valerie Leung, Kieu Mach, Emily C. Charlesworth, Sandy Hicks, Kristine Kizemchuk, Carmine Stumpo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsToronto East General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthopedic surgeryPerioperativePharmacistMedication ReconciliationPharmacyEmergency medicineElective surgeryPatient satisfactionPhysical therapySurgeryFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Medication safety along the continuum of care is dependent on the quality of medication information at each point of transfer. The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of integrating a community-based medication history (MedsCheck) into perioperative medication reconciliation for elective orthopedic surgery patients by assessing postoperative unintentional medication discrepancies. Secondary objectives were to evaluate community pharmacist participation and patient satisfaction. Methods: Patients scheduled for elective hip or knee surgery between April and September 2008 were identified as the study population. Patients and community pharmacies were contacted to coordinate the MedsCheck prior to the pre-admission clinic visit. At the visit, the Meds Check document was used to prepare a best possible medication history, which was documented in the patient chart. Medications were reconciled postoperatively. Participants were surveyed for feedback on the process. Results: Eighty-two patients were included in the study. A MedsCheck was completed for 73.8% (31/42) of eligible patients who were contacted prior to their pre-admission clinic visit. The average number of medications per patient was 8.4. The percentage of patients with at least 1 unintentional medication discrepancy decreased from 68.4% (13/19) to 47.6% (39/82) post-intervention. Total unintentional medication discrepancies decreased from 25.6% to 10.6%. Discussion: Integrating MedsCheck into the perioperative medication reconciliation process resulted in positive outcomes. The main challenge was coordination of the MedsCheck service prior to the patient's pre-admission clinic visit. Conclusion: Integrating MedsCheck into routine perioperative care for orthopedic patients is a feasible way to facilitate pharmacist medication reconciliation and increase patient satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du CanadaSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207