Dynamic evaluation of fluid shifts during normothermic and hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Edema, generalized overhydration and organ dysfunction commonly occur in patients undergoing open-heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and induced hypothermia. Activation of inflammatory reactions induced by contact between blood and foreign surfaces are commonly held responsible for the disturbances of fluid balance ("capillary leak syndrome"). We used an online technique to determine fluid shifts between the intravascular and the interstitial space during normothermic and hypothermic CPB. METHODS: Piglets were placed on CPB (fixed pump flow) via thoracotomy in general anesthesia. In the normothermic group (n=7), the core temperature was kept at 38 degrees C prior to and during 2 h on CPB, whereas in the hypothermic group (n=7) temperature was lowered to 28 degrees C during bypass. The CPB circuit was primed with acetated Ringer's solution. The blood level in the CPB circuit reservoir was held constant during bypass. Ringer's solution was added when fluid substitution was needed (falling blood level in the reservoir). In addition to invasive hemodynamic monitoring, fluid input and losses were accurately recorded. Inflammatory mediators or markers were not measured in this study. RESULTS: Cardiac output, s-electrolytes and arterial blood gases were similar in the two groups in the pre-bypass period. At start of CPB the blood level in the machine reservoir fell markedly in both groups, necessitating fluid supplementation and leading to a markedly reduced hematocrit. This extra fluid need was transient in the normothermic group, but persisted in the hypothermic animals. After 2 h of CPB the hypothermic animals had received 7 times more fluid as compared to the normothermic pigs. CONCLUSION: We found strong indications for a greater fluid extravasation during hypothermic CPB compared with normothermic CPB. The experimental model using the CPB-circuit reservoir as a fluid gauge gives us the opportunity to study further fluid volume shifts, its causes and potential ways to optimize fluid therapy protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".