Decreased live births in women with systemic lupus erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Multiple disease-related factors may limit the number of children born to women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We calculated live births in women with SLE and compared this with general population rates. METHODS: We studied women with SLE from a subset of centers participating in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Prospective Inception Cohort Study of SLE. Women diagnosed as having SLE before age 50 years were included. Using age, calendar-period, and country-specific general population birth rates, we calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of observed to expected live births. We also performed a multivariate analysis with the SIR as the dependent variable to explore potential predictors of live births. RESULTS: A total of 339 women with SLE were studied. The number of live births over the interval (n = 313) was substantially below that which would be expected (n = 479; SIR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.58-0.73). In the multivariate analyses, black race/ethnicity (SIR 1.47, 95% CI 1.08-2.00) and being married or living common-law (SIR 2.04, 95% CI 1.52-2.74) were associated with increased live births (relative to what would be expected). There were trends for fewer live births in women exposed to cyclophosphamide (SIR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56-1.38) and in those with high disease activity (mean SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 update score ≥5; SIR 0.82, 95% CI 0.54-1.25). CONCLUSION: Overall, we found that women with SLE have fewer live births compared with the general population. Marital status, race/ethnicity, and possibly clinical factors may mediate this effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".