MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oc013 — A Simplified Method For Busulfan Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Using Dried Blood Spot Sampling In Pediatric Patient Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation

2013· article· en· W2010613696 on OpenAlexaff
Chakradhara Rao S. Uppugunduri, Marc Ansari, Yves Théorêt, Julien Déglon, François Versace, Fabienne Gumy‐Pause, Pierre Dayer, Jules Desmeules, Youssef Daali

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Therapeutics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBusulfanTherapeutic drug monitoringDried blood spotHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPharmacokineticsTherapeutic windowStem cellHematopoietic stem cellTherapeutic indexBlood samplingDrugTransplantationTherapeutic effectPharmacologyHaematopoiesisSurgeryInternal medicineChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intravenously administered Busulfan (Bu) in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) exhibits therapeutic window phenomenon requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. The dosage of Bu is adjusted based on the first dose pharmacokinetic parameters. Existing methods for the analysis of Bu require long turnaround times with relatively large amounts of blood collection for plasma separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical TherapeuticsSame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207