Testosterone recovery following prolonged adjuvant androgen ablation for prostate carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to describe the rate and completeness of the recovery of testosterone production following prolonged temporary androgen ablative therapy in men with prostate carcinoma undergoing curative radiation therapy. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty-seven men treated with between 3 months and 3 years of adjuvant androgen ablation (AA) were followed at 6-month intervals following cessation of their androgen deprivation therapy. A comparative group of 518 men not undergoing AA were also followed. RESULTS: Drugs used included low dose cyproterone/stilboestrol (CPA/DES) in combination (56%) and 1 month depot (18%) and 3 month depot (25%) leutinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa). Seventy-nine percent of men in the current study recovered normal testosterone levels (10nmol/L), and 93% recovered levels of at least 5nmol/L. In comparison, men who had never received androgen ablative therapy showed a fall of testosterone, with 17% having sub-normal levels after 3 years. Median time to testosterone recovery was 10 months. Factors associated on multivariate analysis with delayed testosterone recovery included advanced age (P = 0.008), low pre-therapy testosterone (P = 0.04), and the use of 3 month LHRHa preparations as compared with CPA/DES (P = 0.002) or 1 month LHRHa preparations (P = 0.015). The duration of drug use was not significantly associated with time to testosterone recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting LHRHa preparations appear to have a more prolonged action than previously supposed. Most men treated for up to 2 years recover normal testosterone levels after cessation of adjuvant androgen ablation, and the limited data available in the current study on patients treated for 3 years also suggests most will recover.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".