Shock initiation of powder mixtures of aluminum with dense metal oxides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strong and dense structural reactive materials may be produced by mixing aluminum powders with heavy metal-oxide powders (such as Bi2O3, PbO, Pb3O4, I2O5, etc.). The addition of certain additives to such mixtures, such as V2O5 and B2O3, can lower the softening point of the oxide mixture below the melting point of aluminum. This could lead to the fabrication of dense and nonporous aluminum-metal oxide structural materials. The shock sensitivity of aluminum-metal oxide mixtures was investigated in this work. The minimum shock initiating pressure was obtained for various porous and non-porous aluminum-metal oxide mixtures using the shock recovery technique. Since most reactions of Al in metal oxide mixtures produce little pressure and material velocity changes but large increases in temperatures, thermocouples were used to observe the bulk reaction onset, which relates to the overall reaction rate, in those mixtures. The mixtures tested were found to be very sensitive to shock initiation and their reaction rates were found to be very fast, compared to other types of reactive powder mixtures. Finally, the addition V2O5 and B2O3 additives or the addition of liquid heptane (to fill the pores) did not significantly lower the sensitivity or reaction rates of the mixtures investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".