Repressed Expression of DC-ACS1 Gene in a Transgenic Carnation Supports the Role of its Expression in the Gynoecium for Ethylene Production in Senescing Flower
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DC-ACS1 is a gene for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthase which is expressed slightly in the gynoecium, but abundantly in petals of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) flowers. It is known that ethylene evolved from the gynoecium triggers the expression of DC-ACS1 and DC-ACO1 (the gene for carnation ACC oxidase), which results in an abundant ethylene production in petals. In a transgenic carnation (16-0-66 line) transformed with DC-ACS1 cDNA in sense orientation, the exogenous ethylene treatment caused the expression of DC-ACO1 in the gynoecium and petals, but not that of DC-ACS1. This suggests that the cosuppression of the expression of endogenous DC-ACS1 gene by the integrated transgene. DC-ACS1 transcript is absent in both gynoecium and petals of senescing 16-0-66 flowers, so that the flowers produce no ethylene; whereas DC-ACO1 transcript is present in the gynoecium but absent in the petals. These findings give further support on the role of the DC-ACS1 gene in the gynoecium for ethylene production by petals in senescing carnation flowers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".