The Cantor Set Constructed from an Infinite Number of Quarks Constituting the Nucleon and the Dark Matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a previous paper, the present author proposed the infinite sub-layer quark model, in which the proton and the neutron are composed of an infinite number of point-like (structure-less) quarks ?? and anti-quarks at an infinite sub-layer level. The limit particle ?? has all one-half quantum numbers of spin , isospin , third component of isospin , and fractional electric charge , where e is the electron charge. This fermion will behave as if it was lepton, since the baryon number vanishes at an infinite sub-layer level. Thus, this ultimate particle is considered as constituting the non-baryonic cold dark matter. A pair of an infinite number of ?? and quarks would be produced in the first moments after the Big Bang and form the nucleons and remain as the dark matter for all time, stable against decay. It was then shown that is violated in the doublet of ?? and quarks to account for the asymmetry of the number of particles and antiparticles in the present universe. Furthermore, it was shown that the Higgs bosons are composed of ?? and dark matter particles. In this paper, we will show that the Cantor set is constructed from an infinite number of point-like quarks ?? and anti-quarks which constitutes the nucleon and the dark matter. It is also shown that the color charges in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) of ?? and quarks vanish and these limiting particles of dark matter have no color force with the strong interaction and subject only to the weak interaction and gravity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".