Review of 1 Year-s Activity in the Grampian Travel Clinic: The Importance of the Oil Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A review of the activities of the Grampian travel clinic was carried out over 1 year to obtain an overall perspective of the clinic workload and to determine how much of the workload was dependent on the oil industry. METHODS: A specially designed data collection sheet was completed for each of the 669 consultations conducted at the Grampian travel clinic, Aberdeen, between February 1, 2002, and January 31, 2003. RESULTS: Patients attending the clinic came in equal numbers from the city of Aberdeen and the Grampian region. Twenty-five percent were traveling for work purposes: 87.4% of this travel was oil related, and most patients were headed to Africa. The commonest vaccines given were for yellow fever, Japanese B encephalitis, and rabies, reflecting the specialist nature of the clinic. Most travelers did leave adequate time for immunization before travel. The public is still apprehensive about using mefloquine as malarial prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Most attendees were traveling on holiday, but a quarter of the consultations were for travel related to the oil industry. Almost 70% of attendees had already visited their general practitioner and were therefore attending the clinic for specialist advice and vaccines. There is a need for increased clinic capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".