Islamic Law and Civil Code: the Law of Property in Egypt By RICHARD A. DEBS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While it is not unusual for monographs to be revised versions of the author’s doctoral dissertation, it is rare indeed when a doctoral dissertation is published—virtually unchanged—some fifty years after it was first submitted. Yet, that is the case with Richard Debs’ extremely well-written and highly-informative monograph, Islamic Law and Civil Code: the Law of Property in Egypt. Debs’ account of the transformation of Egyptian real property law over (now) the past 200 years spans the period beginning with the reforms initiated by Muḥammad ʿAlī, the founder of the modern Egyptian state, up to the agrarian reforms initiated by the Free Officers’ Revolution of 1952 under the leadership of Jamāl ʿAbd al-Nāṣir. The fact that Debs’ thesis could be published some fifty years after it was written speaks highly of its quality, but it is also indicative of the relative lack of progress in Islamic legal studies over the last fifty years, particularly in conceptualizing the relationship of modern reforms to pre-modern Islamic law. Hopefully, publication of this remarkable dissertation will not only make the author’s insights more accessible to the growing number of students interested in Islamic law, but also encourage more sophisticated studies of the transformation(s) of Islamic law in the modern period, a process that is both ongoing and of continued relevance in many jurisdictions of the Muslim world, not the least of them, Egypt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".