MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010906646 · doi:10.1139/e04-025

Integration and spatial analysis of high-resolution geophysical and geological data, eastern Gaspé Peninsula

2004· article· en· W2010906646 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Christine St-Laurent, D Lebel, Denis Lavoie, Michel Malo, Camille St-Hilaire

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Formations and Processes Exploration
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersCentre Eau Terre Environnement, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsGeologyDevonianPaleontologyOutcropLithologySedimentary rockOrdovicianSequence (biology)ConglomerateMagnetic anomalyUnconformity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the vicinity of the Town of Gaspé, the relationships between the Silurian-Devonian sedimentary succession of the Gaspé Belt and the Humber and the Dunnage zones are complex. To unravel these relationships, we used high-resolution aeromagnetic data and regional gravimetric data coupled with field tectonostratigraphic information. The magnetic vertical derivative located several magnetic anomalies associated with near-surface features in the Silurian–Devonian cover sequence. In particular, a conglomerate with magnetic fragments that overlies the Late Silurian Salinic Unconformity is clearly recognizable. Large ovoid anomalies of significant intensity located in the Silurian–Devonian sedimentary cover area cannot be associated with any known geological feature. The interpretation of the high-pass and low-pass filtered aeromagnetic survey indicates that the ovoid anomalies originate below the Silurian–Devonian cover sequence. The most significant of the ovoid anomalies is associated with a gravimetric anomaly. It is proposed that these geophysical anomalies are probably associated with ultramafic and (or) volcanic rocks correlative in the subsurface with outcrops of the Cambrian–Ordovician lithologies of the Lady Step Complex and (or) the Shickshock Group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological Formations and Processes ExplorationFrench-language works237,207