Transfusion of ABO‐nonidentical platelets is not associated with adverse clinical outcomes in cardiovascular surgery patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current blood transfusion standards in Canada and the United States permit transfusion of ABO-nonidentical platelets when ABO-identical platelets are not available. This practice increases the availability of platelets, a component in chronic shortage in Ontario, Canada because of the 5-day shelf-life. The impact of transfusing ABO-nonidentical platelets on patient outcomes is unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS. A retrospective review of 1721 patients who had cardiovascular surgery between November 1989 and December 1999 and who had also received a platelet transfusion perioperatively was conducted. The impact of platelet and plasma incompatibility on clinical outcomes was analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included 1691 patients who were divided into two groups according to the compatibility of the first platelet transfusion received: ABO-identical platelet transfusion (n = 1008) and ABO-nonidentical platelet transfusion (n = 683). The only difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups was that there were more urgent cases in the ABO-identical platelet transfusion group (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in mortality at 30 days (10% for both groups, p = NS) or in postoperative length of stay (median, 7.0 days for both groups, p = NS). No significant differences were found with respect to the use of blood components, indices of bleeding, incidence of infection, or platelet CCIs. CONCLUSION: Transfusion of ABO-nonidentical platelets in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery is not associated with an adverse impact on patient outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".