Kinetic and spectroscopic studies on α- and β-cyclodextrin rotaxanes with (µ-<i>N</i>,<i>N</i>′- bis(4-pyridinylmethylene)-α,ω-alkanediimine)bis[pentacyanoferrate(II)] threads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[2]Pseudorotaxanes have been prepared by threading N,N′-bis(4-pyridinylmethylene)-1,2-ethanediimine (L2), -1,4-butanediimine (L4), and -1,6-hexanediimine (L6) ligands through α-cyclodextrin (α-CD) and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), and have subsequently been converted to the corresponding [2]rotaxane species by coordinating bulky [Fe(CN) 5 ] 3 end groups. The stability constants for the [2]pseudorotaxanes were determined by 1 H NMR chemical shift titrations and increase with the polymethylene chain length n. The rate constants for both the formation of the [Fe(CN) 5 (Ln)] 3 complexes from the [Fe(CN) 5 OH 2 ] 3 ion and Ln, and the rate constants for the dissociation of Ln from the metal complexes, exhibit significant diminutions in the presence of α- and β-CD, owing to inclusions of the free and coordinated ligands, respectively. The lability of the iron(II)pyridine bonds also permits the spontaneous self-assembly of the [2]rotaxane upon the addition of cyclodextrin to the iron dimer complexes. The mechanism for this process involves the rate-determining dissociation of a [Fe(CN) 5 ] 3 unit from [(NC) 5 Fe(Ln)Fe(CN) 5 ] 6 , followed by CD inclusion of the Ln ligand to form a semirotaxane, and subsequent recomplexation by the [Fe(CN) 5 OH 2 ] 3 ion. Key words: cyclodextrins, rotaxanes, pentacyanoferrate(II), ligand substitution, kinetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".