In-vitro comparison of fondaparinux, unfractionated heparin, and enoxaparin in preventing cardiac catheter-associated thrombus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trials showed that fondaparinux (fonda) is at least as effective and safe as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin (enoxa) in acute coronary syndromes. Unexpectedly, there was an increase in catheter-related thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary interventions in fonda-treated patients. METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers were pretreated with aspirin 500 mg 2 h before venesection of 50 ml of blood. Eight groups of anticoagulant (combinations) were tested and volunteers donated blood eight times, thus, acting as their own controls. The groups were UFH, UFH+eptifibatide, enoxa, enoxa+eptifibatide, fonda, fonda+eptifibatide, fonda+(half-therapeutic) UFH, and fonda+eptifibatide+(half-therapeutic) UFH. The blood/anticoagulant mix was kept at 37 degrees C and continuously circulated through a guiding catheter for 60 min or until the catheter became blocked with thrombus. Thrombus development was assessed by weighing each catheter before and after the procedure. Electron microscopy of the catheter lining was used to quantify the degree of erythrocyte and fibrin deposition. RESULTS: Despite fonda anticoagulation, catheters were invariably occluded by thrombus before the 60 min perfusion period had elapsed. Thrombotic catheter occlusion occurred even with higher fonda concentrations and combined fonda/eptifibatide use. All other combinations (including fonda and half-therapeutic UFH) ensured catheter patency for 60 min. Furthermore, thrombus weight and the cell/fibrinogen counts were significantly increased in fonda and fonda+eptifibatide compared with other treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with fonda, even in combination with eptifibatide, was not sufficient to prevent cardiac catheter thrombus development in our in-vitro study. However, the combination of fonda with 'half' therapeutic dosages of UFH were as efficient as other treatment strategies in preventing thrombus formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".