Regulation of intrathymic T‐cell development by Lunatic Fringe– Notch1 interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intrathymic Notch1 signaling critically regulates T-lineage specification and commitment as well as T-cell progenitor survival and differentiation. Notch1 activation is continuously required during progression of early CD4/CD8-double-negative thymocytes to the CD4/CD8-double-positive stage. This developmental transition occurs as thymocytes migrate from the corticomedullary junction (CMJ) to the outer subcapsular zone (SCZ) of the thymus. Members of two families of structurally distinct Notch ligands, Delta-like 1 and Jagged-1, are expressed by cortical thymic epithelial cells, but it is not known which ligands are functionally required within the CMJ and SCZ microenvironmental niches. Our laboratory has investigated this question by genetically manipulating thymocyte expression of Lunatic Fringe (L-Fng), a glycosyltransferase that enhances sensitivity of Notch receptors to Delta-like ligands. This approach has revealed that low-threshold intrathymic Notch1 signals instruct multipotent thymus-seeding progenitors to suppress their B-cell potential and choose the T-cell fate. This strategy has also revealed that Delta-like Notch ligands are functionally limiting in both the CMJ and SCZ microenvironmental niches. Finally, we discuss our recent demonstration that L-Fng-mediated competition for Delta-like ligands is an important mechanism for regulating thymus size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it