2 EVIDENCE FOR THE PRESENCE OF OVULATION-INDUCING FACTOR IN PORCINE AND EQUINE SEMINAL PLASMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of an ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in the seminal plasma of llamas and alpacas (reflex ovulators) and cattle (spontaneous ovulators) has been reported previously (Ratto MH et al. 2006 Theriogenology 66, 1102–1106). The presence of this protein in unrelated species supports the hypothesis that OIF is a conserved factor among species. The objectives of this study were to determine if OIF was present in equine and porcine seminal plasma, and whether the proportion of test animals (llamas) that ovulated in response to treatment with seminal plasma was related to dose. In Experiment 1, female llamas were assigned randomly to four groups (n = 8 or 9 per group) and treated intramuscularly with 1 mL llama seminal plasma (positive control), 3 mL equine seminal plasma, 3 mL porcine seminal plasma, or 2 mL saline (negative control). Ovulation and maximum corpus luteum diameter were compared using ultrasonography and confirmed with blood samples taken on Day 7 (Day 0 = day of treatment) to determine plasma progesterone concentration. The diameter of the preovulatory follicle at the time of treatment did not differ among groups. Equine seminal plasma induced ovulations in 3/8 (38%) llamas compared to 0/8 (0%) llamas treated with saline or porcine seminal plasma (P = 0.1). The proportion of females that ovulated was lower in the equine group (P < 0.01) compared with those animals treated with llama seminal plasma (9/9; 100%). Of the animals that ovulated, maximum CL diameter did not differ between llama and equine seminal plasma-treated groups (mean ± SEM; 11.1 ± 1.1, 11.5 ± 1.5, respectively). Similarly, progesterone concentrations were not different among llamas treated with llama seminal plasma or equine seminal plasma (mean ± SEM; 3.1 ± 0.4, 3.7 ± 1.2, respectively). The design of Experiment 2 was the same, but the dose of equine and porcine seminal plasma was increased to 8 mL and 10 mL, respectively. The proportion of females that ovulated was less (P < 0.05) in equine (2/9) and porcine (3/9) seminal plasma groups compared with the group treated with llama seminal plasma (9/9). There were no ovulations detected in llamas treated with saline (0/8). Although differences between equine, porcine, and negative control groups did not reach significance, results provide some evidence for the presence of OIF in equine and porcine seminal plasma. The effect of dose of equine and porcine seminal plasma is equivocal, suggesting that the concentration of OIF in the seminal plasma of these species may be very low and the optimal dose for inducing ovulation in test animals had not been reached. Research supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".