Fluid Shear Stress Reduces Simvastatin Induced Adhesion Molecule Expression in Cytokine Activated Endothelial Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although originally designed as inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are now known to also have non-lipid lowering benefits [1]. Statins have been reported to modulate gene expression in endothelial cells, however, the effect of statins on adhesion molecule expression is contradictory. Some studies report a decrease in adhesion molecule mRNA and/or protein after statin treatment [2], while others have shown that statins potentiate the effect of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) [3]. To the best of our knowledge, the effects of statins on gene expression in cultured endothelial cells has been done in static conditions only and no study has examined the effect of blood flow. This is particularly important since fluid shear stress is a strong regulator of endothelial cell function and phenotype [4]. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of statins on vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression in endothelial cells by evaluating their biological response under fluid flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".