MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011113445 · doi:10.1063/1.2948346

On the efficacy of imploding plasma liners for magnetized fusion target compression

2008· article· en· W2011113445 on OpenAlex
P.B. Parks

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsImplosionRADIUSPlasmaMach numberAdiabatic processAtomic physicsAtmospheric-pressure plasmaMechanicsNuclear physicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new theoretical model is formulated to study the idea of merging a spherical array of converging plasma jets to form a “plasma liner” that further converges to compress a magnetized plasma target to fusion conditions [Y. C. F. Thio et al., “Magnetized target fusion in a spheroidal geometry with standoff drivers,” Current Trends in International Fusion Research II, edited by E. Panarella (National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1999)]. For a spherically imploding plasma liner shell with high initial Mach number (M=liner speed/sound speed) the rise in liner density with decreasing radius r goes as ρ∼1∕r2, for any constant adiabatic index γ=dlnp∕dlnρ. Accordingly, spherical convergence amplifies the ram pressure of the liner on target by the factor A∼C2, indicating strong coupling to its radial convergence C=rm∕R, where rm(R)=jet merging radius (compressed target radius), and A=compressed target pressure/initial liner ram pressure. Deuterium-tritium (DT) plasma liners with initial velocity ∼100km∕s and γ=5∕3, need to be hypersonic M∼60 and thus cold in order to realize values of A∼104 necessary for target ignition. For optically thick DT liners, T<2eV, n>1019–1020cm−3, blackbody radiative cooling is appreciable and may counteract compressional heating during the later stages of the implosion. The fluid then behaves as if the adiabatic index were depressed below 5∕3, which in turn means that the same amplification A=1.6×104 can be accomplished with a reduced initial Mach number M≈12.7(γ−0.3)4.86, valid in the range (10<M<60). Analytical calculations indicate that the hydrodynamic efficiency for plasma liners assembled by current and anticipated plasma jets is <4%. A new similarity model for fusion α-particle heating of the collapsed liner indicates that “spark” ignition of the DT liner fuel does not appear to be possible for magnetized fusion targets with typical threshold values of areal density ρR<0.02gcm−2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it