MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011119977 · doi:10.1080/01443610500443196

Obstetric hysterectomy in a population of South East England

2006· article· en· W2011119977 on OpenAlexaff
Olufemi Eniola, Susan Bewley, Mark Waterstone, Richard Hooper, Charles Wolfe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHysterectomyCaesarean sectionObstetricsIncidence (geometry)PopulationPregnancyGynecologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and outcome of obstetric hysterectomy. Of 48,865 women who delivered after 24 weeks' gestation in the South East Thames Region between March 1997 and February 1998, 22 women with obstetric hysterectomy were identified, and 15 prospectively followed-up (71% response rate). The incidence of obstetric hysterectomy was 0.45/1,000 deliveries with one maternal death (4.5%). Identified risk factors were delivery by caesarean section (68%), previous caesarean section (33%) and placenta praevia (24%). Mean blood loss and replacement were 5.2 l and 17 units, with a 38% risk of re-operation and 21% risk of urinary tract injury. Follow-up showed poor general health 6-9 months after delivery with 10 women (67%) attending outpatients and four (27%) requiring emergency admission to hospital. This population survey found a low rate of obstetric hysterectomy but severe morbidity. Obstetric hysterectomy is a good candidate for a national morbidity audit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and GynaecologySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207