MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011143824 · doi:10.4141/s99-103

Pasture type and fertilization effects on soil chemical properties and nutrient redistribution

2001· article· en· W2011143824 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
W. Chen, W. P. McCaughey, Cynthia A. Grant, L. D. Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAgronomyPastureLoamGrazingHuman fertilizationEnvironmental scienceFertilizerNutrientSoil fertilitySoil horizonSoil classificationSoil waterSoil typeChemistrySoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soil samples were collected from beef pastures varying in species composition and fertilizer inputs after being grazed by cow-calf pairs for 4 yr (1995-1998) near Brandon, Manitoba. The objective of this experiment is to examine the impact of 4 yr of continuous rotational grazing on soil chemical properties and nutrient redistribution in mixed alfalfa-grass and pure-grass pastures with or without fertilization. Pastures were established on an Orthic Black Chernozemic, fine sandy-loam soil. Compared with N-fertilized pure-grass pastures, alfalfa-grass pastures had greater seasonal soil mineral-N supply, and tended to have higher total soil C, N and organic C. In grazed systems in this environment, the use of alfalfa as the primary N source may be more profitable and sustainable than using fertilizer N. However, considering the seasonal changes in soil nitrification rate observed in alfalfa-grass pastures, caution needs to be taken when stands with high legume content are used to maximize animal performance, because this may increase the risk of N losses into the environment. Fertilization over a 5-yr period (1994-1998) tended to lower surface soil pH. Application of P significantly increased soil “extractable” P levels in the top 15-cm soil layer. However, K fertilization only increased surface soil “extractable” K slightly compared with unfertilized pastures. There was also no effect of S application on soil “extractable” S. Zone effects on soil mineral N and soil “extractable” P, K and S were limited to the surface (0–7.5 cm). For mineral N, the zone effect seemed to be more pronounced in first rotation than in second rotation. The magnitude of K redistribution was greater than for S and P due to higher K intake and excretion. Use of rotational stocking with short grazing periods appears to have resulted in a relatively even redistribution of nutrients derived from animal excreta. Key words: Grazing, beef pasture, nitrogen dynamics, sustainability

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2001
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207