Endothelin receptor blockade improves endothelial function in human internal mammary arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Endothelial dysfunction, specifically endothelium-derived contracting factors have been implicated in the development of arterial conduit vasospasm. The potent vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) has received much attention in this regard. The present study was designed to evaluate the role of ET-1 in the development of endothelial dysfunction in human internal mammary arteries (IMA). To this aim, we examined the effects of specific and non-specific ET-receptor antagonists on endothelial function (assessed using acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vasodilation) in segments of IMA obtained during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. METHODS: Vascular segments of IMA were obtained from 51 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and in vitro endothelium-dependent and -independent responses to ACh and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) were assessed. Isometric dose response curves (DRC) to ACh and SNP were constructed in pre-contracted rings in the presence and absence of bosentan (ET(A/B) receptor antagonist, 3 microM), BQ-123 (ET(A) antagonist, 1 microM) and BQ-788 (ET(B) antagonist, 1 microM) using the isolated organ bath apparatus. Percent maximum relaxation (%E(max)) and sensitivity (pEC(50)) were compared between interventions. RESULTS: ACh caused dose-dependent endothelium-mediated relaxation in IMA (%E(max) 43+/-4, pEC(50) 6. 74+/-0.12). In the presence of bosentan, BQ-123 and BQ-788 ACh-induced relaxation was significantly augmented (%E(max) bosentan 60+/-3, BQ-123 56+/-4, BQ-788 53+/-5 vs. control 43+/-4, P<0.05) without affecting sensitivity. The effects of these antagonists were endothelium-specific since endothelium-independent responses to SNP remained unaltered. Furthermore, the beneficial effects were independently and maximally mediated by ET(A) and ET(B) receptors (%E(max) BQ-123 56+/-4 vs. BQ-788 53+/-5 vs. bosentan 60+/-3, P>0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: These data uncover, for the first time, beneficial effects of ET receptor blockade on endothelial-dependent vasorelaxation in human IMA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".