Suppressing the Thermal Metacyclophanediene to Dihydropyrene Isomerization: Synthesis and Rearrangement of 8,16-Dicyano[2.2]metacyclophane-1,9-diene and Evidence Supporting the Proposed Biradicaloid Mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthesis of 8,16-dicyano-anti-[2.2]metacyclophane-1,9-diene, 1b, was achieved in five steps from 1,3-bis(bromomethyl)benzonitrile. Unlike most metacyclophanedienes which easily thermally isomerize (tau 1/2 = minutes to days at 20 degrees C) to dihydropyrenes 2, dinitrile 1b shows no tendency to convert thermally to 2b at room temperature (tau 1/2 > 30 years), consistent with predictions based on calculation of activation barriers. Irradiation of cyclophanediene 1b with UV light readily forms the dinitriledihydropyrene 2b, which unexpectedly shows a much more facile (50 degrees C) 1,5-sigmatropic rearrangement of the internal nitrile groups to give dihydropyrenes 9b and then 10b than is the case for internal methyl substituents, 2a, which forms 9a at temperatures above 190 degrees C. Synthesis of the 2-formyl derivative 1c and the 2-naphthoyl derivative 1d are also described. These substituents were predicted to lower the activation barrier for the thermal closing reaction to the corresponding dihydropyrenes, and experimental evidence supports these calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".