MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011273203 · doi:10.1115/pvp2003-2015

Effects of Hydrided Region Overload on Delayed Hydride Cracking Initiation From Flaws in Zr-2.5 Nb Pressure Tubes

2003· article· en· W2011273203 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gordon K. Shek, Jun Cui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsKinectrics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceHydrideCrackingMetallurgyDeuteriumStress (linguistics)HydrogenFracture (geology)Composite materialChemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Zr-2.5 Nb pressure tubes of CANDU™ (CANada Deuterium Uranium) reactors are susceptible to a crack initiation and growth mechanism known as Delayed Hydride Cracking (DHC), which is a process that involves hydrogen diffusion, hydride precipitation, hydrided region formation and fracture at a flaw-tip. An overload occurs when the hydrided region at a flaw is loaded to a stress higher than that at which this region is formed. Flaw disposition requires justification that the hydrided region overload from normal reactor operating and transient loading conditions will not fracture the hydrided region, and will not initiate DHC. To evaluate the effects of hydrided region overload on DHC initiation, a series of monotonically increasing load experiments were performed on specimens prepared from unirradiated pressure tube materials with the hydrided region formed at flaws with root radii varying from 15 to 350 μm, and blunt notches with and without secondary flaws. Test results indicate that the resistance to overload fracture is dependent on a variety of parameters including flaw geometry, hydride formation stress, loading history, and overload test temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207