MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011276272 · doi:10.1021/jf101044f

Response of <i>Bacillus cereus</i> to γ-Irradiation in Combination with Carvacrol or Mild Heat Treatment

2010· article· en· W2011276272 on OpenAlexaff
Samia Ayari, Dominic Dussault, Mathieu Millette, Moktar Hamdi, Monique Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRadiation Effects and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsBio-K+ International (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarvacrolBacillus cereusChemistryIntracellularBiochemistryBacteriaChromatographyBiologyEssential oil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carvacrol and mild heat treatment were tested for their efficiency to increase the radiosensitivity of Bacillus cereus in broth. The bacterium was treated with gamma-irradiation alone or in combination with carvacrol at its minimal inhibitory concentration or mild heat treatment for 10 min at 45 degrees C. The effects of this combination of treatments were studied on various parameters: the bacterial viability, the modifications of the cell morphology with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the cellular fatty acids composition of the membrane quantified by gas chromatography, the intracellular and extracellular adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) concentrations, and the DNA degradation. Combined treatments resulted in additive or synergistic effects as compared to gamma-irradiation alone. A significant modification (P < or = 0.05) of the fatty acid composition and unsaturation ratios was observed. Pretreatment with mild heat or carvacrol before irradiation disturbed the membrane integrity of B. cereus and induced a significant decrease (P < or = 0.05) of the intracellular ATP concentration. SEM observations revealed that the cell membrane was more severely affected with combined treatment than irradiation alone. The electrophoresis analysis showed that DNA degradation by combined treatments was greater than the gamma-irradiation alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicRadiation Effects and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207