MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011337827 · doi:10.1071/rdv21n1ab143

143 SUPEROVULATORY RESPONSE AND EMBRYO PRODUCTION INFLUENCED BY THE ADDITION OF LH AND EFFECT OF THE REPEATABILITY IN SANTA INêS SHEEP

2008· article· en· W2011337827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Emília Franco Oliveira, Isabel Cristina França dos Santos, J. S. P. Pieroni, R. M. Ferreira, Mabel Freitas Cordeiro, S. F. Souza, J. F. da Fonseca, W. R. R. Vicente

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleAnimal scienceCloprostenolEmbryoRepeatabilitySemenInternal medicineBiologyEndocrinologyAndrologyMedicineChemistryHormoneOvulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim this study was to evaluate the effect of the addition of LH in superovulatory response and embryo production in Santa Inês sheep. Ten donors with 60.3 ± 10.7 kg and BCS of 3.9 ± 0.3 were superovulated in a cross-over design, with a 60-day interval. Estrus was synchronized with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (CIDR™; Pfizer Animal Health, Brazil) inserted on Day 0 and replaced by a new one on Day 7, that was maintained to Day 14. Two doses of 37.5 g of D-cloprostenol (Prolise™, Arsa, Buenos Aires, Argentina) were administered, on Days 7 and 14. Donors also receive 256 mg of pFSH (Folltropin™, Bioniche, Belleville, ON, Canada) in 8 decreasing doses, starting on Day 12. On Day 14, all females received 200 IU of eCG (Novormon ™, Syntex, Argentina). On Day 15, the animals were homogeneously allocated in 1 of 2 groups: Control (GC, n = 10) and treated (G-LH, n = 10). Ewes in GC did not receive exogenous LH, whereas ewes in G-LH were treated with 7.5 mg of LH (Lutropin™, Bioniche), on Day 15. All females were inseminated by laparoscopy, with frozen–thawed semen, 42 and 48 h after CIDR removal. On Day 21, the embryos were surgically collected. The superovulatory response was classified in scores: (0) 4 or fewer CL; (1) between 5 and 10 CL, and (2) 11 or more CL. Means were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test and percentages using chi-square (P < 0.05). Most of donors (70%, 7/10) from G-LH presented a superovulatory response classified as score 2, and the remaining (30%, 3/10) as score 1, whereas, half of the controls were classified as score 2 and half as score 1. Ovulation rate tended to be greater in G-LH (135/158, 85.4% v. 105/135, 77.7%, P = 0.08). The number of CL (mean ± SD) was 10.5 ± 3.8 in GC and 13.5 ± 4.84 in G-LH, but was not statistically different. The number of anovulatory follicles (AF) did not differ between groups (GC: 3.0 ± 3.2; G-LH: 2.3 ± 1.6), but the proportion of AF tended to decrease in G-LH (30/135, 22.2% v. 23/158, 14.5%, P = 0.08). Considering embryo production, there was no difference between GC and G-LH (P > 0.05) related to number of recovered ova/embryos (6.1 ± 4.6 v. 8.4 ± 5.2), viable embryos (3.8 ± 4.3 v. 4.2 ± 5.2), unfertilized (1.7 ± 3.4 v. 2.0 ± 2.9) and degenerated embryos (0.7 ± 0.7 v. 2.2 ± 2.9), respectively. Data showed that the addition of LH tended to increase ovulation rate and to decrease the proportion of AF, but did not affect the number of viable embryos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207