MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011360022 · doi:10.1117/12.733883

Novel applications of an affordable short-range digital Lidar

2007· article· en· W2011360022 on OpenAlexaff
Mark R. Allard, Félix Cayer, Yves Champagne, François Babin, Daniel Cantin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarRangingSIGNAL (programming language)Remote sensingLaserComputer scienceSignal processingRange (aeronautics)WaveformOpticsDigital signal processingMaterials scienceComputer hardwarePhysicsTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design and application results of an affordable short range (less than 100 m) digital LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) system will be presented. This work was initiated because many short-range standoff detection applications would benefit from such a system. The lidar features a fiber-based component integrated in the optical module, which allows for hardware partial compensation of the backscattered signal losses observed at short distances due to a biaxial configuration of the lidar optics. This is an important advantage for particle density computations. The digitized backscattered laser signals are available for signal processing. A dedicated FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) allows for real-time averaging of the signal waveforms captured at the maximum 50-kHz pulse repetition frequency of the laser. Several application-specific tests have been performed. The first of these was real-time onboard monitoring of pesticide drift in agricultural spraying applications. The signal levels were sufficient for control of the spraying operations and prevention of pesticide drift into sensitive areas. The second was a dust monitoring application. The lidar was installed in a quarry and signals from dust clouds were recorded. Real-time monitoring capabilities were shown to be promising. Other applications involving detection of solid targets in degraded visibility conditions caused by fog or snowfalls were also tested and are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.602
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207