Spectroscopic studies and evaluation of thermorheological properties of softwood and hardwood lignin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy ( FTIR) was used to determine characteristic absorption peaks of softwood kraft lignin and soda hardwood lignin. Remarkable spectral differences were noticed between the different lignins due to their various chemical structures. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry ( 1 H NMR) was employed to analyze the structure of lignin. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry ( MALDI‐TOF) provided important data regarding the molecular weight distribution of lignin. Thermal stability of softwood lignin was found to be remarkably higher than that of hardwood lignin. Softening temperature and glass transition temperature of lignin were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) which was useful in selecting an optimal temperature profile during extrusion process. Rheological studies provided valuable information about the viscosity of lignins. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it